Understanding FMEA: Failure Mode Analysis for Optimized Risk Management

Article

Understanding FMEA: Failure Mode Analysis for Optimized Risk Management

twitter
linkedin
facebook

A Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) is a widely recognized methodology in risk management and continuous improvement. Initially developed in the 1940s and 1950s by the U.S. military, it was created to enhance the reliability of weapons systems and minimize critical failures that could jeopardize missions. Over time, FMEA was adopted by industries such as aerospace, automotive, and other discrete manufacturing sectors, establishing itself as an essential tool for identifying and mitigating risks in processes and products.

The underlying principle of FMEA is straightforward yet highly effective: anticipate potential failures, analyze their causes, and implement corrective actions to prevent issues before they occur. By mapping possible failure modes and their corresponding causes, organizations can reduce costs associated with errors while strengthening the safety, quality, and efficiency of their operations.

This article will explore the fundamentals of this methodology, its main objectives, and how it can transform the approach to risk in different sectors.

What is FMEA?

A Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) is a tool used to identify and assess potential failures, enabling the implementation of actions to prevent or mitigate their causes and impacts.

FMEA definition

FMEA is a structured methodology for identifying potential failure modes in products, processes, or systems and assessing their causes and consequences. Failure modes refer to how something can fail to perform its intended function, while effects describe the impacts of those failures.

Essential concepts of FMEA

Figure 1 – Essential concepts of FMEA

FMEA aims to anticipate problems, identify risks, and implement preventive or corrective measures before failures occur.

How to assess risks with FMEA?

FMEA uses a quantitative approach to assess risks by evaluating three key factors:

  • Severity (S): the impact of the failure.
  • Occurrence (O): the likelihood or frequency of the failure mode occurring.
  • Detection (D): the ability to detect a failure mode before it causes issues.

The combination of these factors produces the Risk Priority Number (RPN), calculated using the formula: RPN = S × O × D

RPN calculation

Figure 2 – RPN calculation

The RPN helps prioritize risks, indicating where to focus efforts to implement improvement actions. However, particular attention should be given to high Severity ratings, even if Occurrence and Detection ratings are low, as they indicate significant impact. After corrective measures are implemented, the RPN is recalculated to assess the effectiveness of the changes.

Main objectives of FMEA

The actual value of FMEA lies in establishing a prioritized action plan to mitigate risks, thereby improving the quality, reliability, and efficiency of systems, products, or processes. The main objectives of this approach are:

  1. Failure prevention: Identify potential failures before they occur, reducing the likelihood of critical problems.
  2. Improved reliability and quality: Enhance product and process robustness through risk analysis and mitigation.
  3. Cost reduction: Avoid costs associated with failures, such as rework, warranties, customer loss, and reputational damage.
  4. Regulatory compliance: Demonstrate that risks have been assessed and mitigated as required in regulated industries.
  5. Continuous improvement: Provide a solid foundation for monitoring and updating processes and systems, driving ongoing improvements.

FMEA is widely applied across automotive, aerospace, and pharmaceutical industries, where reliability and safety are critical.

The different types of FMEA

FMEA can be applied to various organizational contexts, adapting to the specific needs of each sector or area. Product FMEA and Process FMEA stand out among their primary applications, each with distinct objectives and characteristics.

Product FMEA

Product FMEA is used to identify and analyze potential failure modes related to the design or components of a product. The primary focus is ensuring the final product is reliable, safe, and meets quality requirements.

The objectives include:

  • Identifying design weaknesses before production begins.
  • Reducing the risk of failures throughout the product’s lifecycle.
  • Enhancing user experience and customer satisfaction.

This type of FMEA is commonly applied in industries such as automotive, electronics, and medical devices, where safety and quality are critical.

Process FMEA

Process FMEA focuses on potential failures that may occur during production stages. This type of analysis is particularly valuable for optimizing processes, such as production lines, to minimize waste and improve operational efficiency.

The objectives include:

  • Identifying causes of inefficiencies and bottlenecks in the process.
  • Ensuring compliance with quality standards and regulatory requirements.
  • Reducing costs associated with failures or rework.

This type of FMEA is frequently used in industries such as manufacturing, logistics, and services, where continuous process improvement is essential for operational success.

Why use FMEA in your organization?

Implementing FMEA is a practice that delivers significant benefits for organizations seeking to manage risks proactively and efficiently. Through a detailed analysis of failure modes and their impacts, this methodology helps prevent problems and fosters a safer and more productive environment.

Discover how FMEA can transform your risk management and enhance your operational performance

Improve quality and reliability

FMEA helps identify critical points in design or processes that could jeopardize the quality and reliability of a product or service. By anticipating potential failures, organizations can implement preventive improvements, boosting confidence in their systems and ensuring consistent performance over time.

Reduce costs related to failures

Failure mode analysis helps avoid costs associated with issues such as rework, unexpected stoppages, returns, or repairs. By prioritizing improvement actions based on the severity and likelihood of failures, FMEA supports the efficient use of resources and reduces operational expenses.

Ensure compliance with standards and regulations

In regulated industries such as automotive, pharmaceutical, and aerospace, FMEA is essential for demonstrating compliance with safety and quality requirements. Applying this methodology ensures that all risks are thoroughly analyzed and mitigated, simplifying audits and compliance with specific standards.

Enhance customer satisfaction

More reliable products and services with fewer failures lead to improved customer experience. By implementing FMEA, organizations can ensure their products meet customer expectations, strengthening brand trust and fostering greater loyalty.

How to effectively implement an FMEA analysis?

Implementing FMEA requires structured planning and collaboration from a multidisciplinary team. Below are the steps for conducting the analysis effectively, ensuring reliable results, and relevant improvement actions. This methodology is supported by a table that consolidates all the information.

Example template for FMEA

Figure 3 – Example template for FMEA

Step 1: Assemble the team

A multidisciplinary team must bring specialists with technical and operational expertise relevant to the system, process, or product being analyzed. The team should include members from various departments, such as engineering, manufacturing, maintenance, and quality, to ensure a comprehensive analysis. Before starting the analysis, it is essential to provide all team members with training on the FMEA methodology.

Step 2: Define the study’s scope

The system, process, or component to be analyzed must be clearly defined. It is necessary to specify the required level of detail, the system boundaries, the operational environment, and the objectives of the FMEA. This step eliminates ambiguities and ensures that the study remains focused and objective.

Step 3: Identify potential failure modes

Conduct brainstorming sessions to identify all potential failure modes that could occur in the system or process being analyzed, covering each component or step where expected performance might be compromised. Resources such as process diagrams, flowcharts, cause-and-effect diagrams (Ishikawa), and historical failure records can support this analysis, helping identify potential issues.

Step 4: Analyze effects and causes

For each identified failure mode, it is necessary to determine its effects on the system and operations. The severity of the impact should be rated, considering factors such as safety, quality, and costs. Severity is rated on a scale of 1 to 10, where 10 represents a critical severity level.

Next, the potential causes of each failure mode must be identified by analyzing technical, operational, or environmental factors. Afterward, the existing preventive controls should be reviewed. The likelihood of occurrence of each cause is then rated using a scale from 1 to 10, where 10 represents the highest frequency of occurrence.

Next, the current detection controls in the process must be evaluated, i.e., the mechanisms in place to identify faults before they cause difficulties. Detection is rated to reflect the effectiveness of these controls in identifying specific failures before they create problems in the process. This rating ranges from 1, indicating near-certain detection, to 10, indicating the inability to detect the failure.

Step 5: Assess the criticality of failures

Assigning criticality ratings to each failure is a key step in the FMEA process, combining the severity of its effects, the likelihood of occurrence, and the ability to detect it before the impact. The Risk Priority Number (RPN) is the result of the three assigned ratings: Severity × Occurrence × Detection. These ratings should be used to prioritize failures requiring immediate corrective actions. However, it is essential to avoid relying exclusively on the RPN as the sole criterion for decision-making. There are no universal RPN thresholds that mandate action or exempt the team from taking action based on their value.
Each failure should be assessed within the specific context of the analyzed system, ensuring a more critical and practical approach to failure management.

Step 6: Develop and implement corrective actions

Based on the FMEA analysis, corrective and preventive actions should be developed and implemented to reduce the impact or likelihood of the most critical failures. These actions target one of the previously assigned ratings: Severity, Occurrence, or Detection. The measures can include design modifications, process improvements, or the implementation of additional controls. The proposed actions must be specific, measurable, and feasible. The primary objectives are:

  • Eliminate failure modes with a “Severity” rating of 9 or 10.
  • Reduce the “Occurrence” of causes by introducing error-proofing systems and minimizing variability.
  • Improve “Detection” through targeted process interventions.

These actions must ensure the effective mitigation of identified risks while promoting sustainable improvements.

Step 7: Monitor and continuously improve

Processes should be implemented to monitor the effectiveness of corrective actions and identify new failure modes over time. FMEA should result in actions that reduce high-risk items to acceptable levels. After implementing the actions, the reclassified Risk Priority Number (RPN) should be compared to the original RPN, with a reduction in this value being the expected outcome. If the risk remains high even after the actions have been taken, a new course of action must be developed. This process should be repeated iteratively until the risk level reaches acceptable values.

Need support implementing FMEA in your organization? Our experts are here to guide you!

Additional tools and techniques for FMEA

Additional tools and techniques can help identify, analyze, and mitigate risks associated with failure modes to complement and strengthen the results of FMEA. These tools provide a broader and more structured perspective to support analysis and decision-making.

Process mapping

Process mapping is a technique that visually describes the flow of activities, inputs, and outputs within a process. This method provides a detailed understanding of the current operations, highlighting critical points where failures may occur and identifying opportunities for improvement. Key benefits include:

  • Providing a detailed view of the process to identify potential failure modes.
  • Facilitating the detection of redundancies, inefficiencies, or gaps in workflows.
  • Supporting the definition of corrective actions and continuous improvement by aligning processes with organizational objectives.

Functional analysis

Functional analysis is a technique that examines the goals and functions of a system, product, or process. The focus is on understanding how each component contributes to overall performance, enabling the identification of potential areas for improvement and failure modes that could compromise functionality. Key benefits include:

  • Facilitating the identification of critical ties between components.
  • Prioritizing failures based on their functional significance.
  • Assisting in defining performance and safety requirements.

Ishikawa diagram

Also known as the “Cause-and-Effect Diagram” or “Fishbone Diagram,” this tool helps visualize the potential causes of a problem or failure. The diagram provides a clear overview of the factors influencing performance by categorizing causes into areas such as people, processes, materials, machines, environment, and methods. Key benefits include:

  • Quickly identifying root causes of problems.
  • Structuring information in a clear and accessible visual format.
  • Supporting the development of effective corrective actions.

FMEA applications

FMEA is frequently applied across various sectors to enhance continuous and discrete manufacturing, improving product and process reliability, safety, and efficiency. Below, we highlight how this methodology is utilized in two critical industries: pharmaceutical manufacturing and aerospace manufacturing.

Pharmaceutical manufacturing

FMEA ensures the pharmaceutical industry’s medication quality and patient safety. Its application enables:

  • Identifying potential failures in critical processes, such as ingredient mixing or drug packaging.
  • Analyzing the impacts of these failures, including variations in product efficacy or stability.
  • Implementing corrective measures, such as improving control systems or adjusting operating conditions, to ensure compliance with strict regulations and maintain market trust.

The use of FMEA in the pharmaceutical industry drives operational excellence, enabling continuous improvement across manufacturing, storage, and transportation. This ensures quality, safety, and regulatory compliance at every process stage.

Aerospace industry

In the aerospace sector, reliability, quality, and excellence are indispensable. FMEA is applied throughout all system lifecycle phases, from design to aerospace maintenance. This analysis enables:

  • Identifying failure modes that could compromise the performance of critical systems, such as engines, control systems, or structural components.
  • Assessing the severity and likelihood of failures, prioritizing the most critical ones for corrective action.
  • Implementing improvements that reduce the risk of significant failures, ensuring compliance with the industry’s high safety and quality standards.

The application of FMEA enhances quality and efficiency in the aerospace sector by ensuring that critical systems operate with maximum reliability and safety, meeting the rigorous standards demanded by the industry.

Still have some questions about FMEA?

What is the main objective of FMEA?

The primary goal of FMEA is to identify, analyze, and prioritize potential failure modes in products, processes, or systems to reduce risks and implement corrective actions effectively. This methodology enhances reliability, quality, and safety while minimizing negative impacts on performance and operational costs. FMEA also supports strategic decision-making by helping organizations focus resources on the most critical areas and ensuring compliance with regulations.

What is the criticality index or Risk Priority Number?

The criticality index, or Risk Priority Number (RPN), is a metric used in FMEA to evaluate and prioritize failure modes based on their severity, likelihood of occurrence, and detection. This index helps determine which failures require immediate attention and which can be monitored or addressed later.

The most common formula for calculating the criticality index or RPN is:

Severity (S) × Occurrence (O) × Detection (D)

  • Severity (S): Measures the impact of the failure.
  • Occurrence (O): Estimates the frequency of the failure’s occurrence.
  • Detection (D): Assesses the ability to detect the failure before it causes problems.

By using the criticality index, organizations can objectively prioritize corrective actions, optimize resources, and ensure greater effectiveness in risk management. Failure modes with a high severity rating should be addressed, even if the RPN is not exceptionally high.

Is FMEA applicable to small businesses?

Yes, FMEA applies to small businesses and can be tailored to their needs and resources. While the methodology is often associated with large manufacturing industries, small businesses can significantly benefit from implementing it to:

  • Identify risks in products or processes critical to their operations.
  • Avoid unnecessary failure-related costs, such as rework or customer loss.
  • Improve the quality of their products or services, enhancing competitiveness in the market.
  • Demonstrate compliance with standards and regulations, especially in highly regulated sectors.

By adopting a structured approach, small businesses can efficiently implement FMEA as a strategic tool to grow sustainably and manage risks proactively.

See more on Maintenance

Find out more about improving this business area

Get the latest news about Kaizen Institute